|
|
|
| Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 6, Zeilen: 30-34 |
Quelle: Blatz et al 2003 Seite(n): 268, Zeilen: left col. 7-10.13-22 |
|---|---|
| A strong, durable resin bond provides high retention 6) improves marginal adaptation and prevents microleakage 7) and increases fracture resistance of the restored tooth and the restoration 8). Bonding to traditional silica-based ceramics is a predictable procedure yielding durable results when certain guidelines are followed. 9-12) However, the composition and physical properties of high-strength ceramic materials, such as [aluminum oxide- based (Al2O3) and zirconium oxide-based (ZrO2) ceramics 12), differ substantially from silica-based ceramics, and require alternative bonding techniques to achieve a strong, long-term, durable resin bond 12).]
6) O. M. el-Mowafy, A. H. Fenton, N. Forrester and M. Milenkovic, J Prosthet Dent, 76, 524-9 (1996). 7) J. A. Sorensen and E. C. Munksgaard, Eur J Oral Sci, 103, 116-20 (1995). 8) A. Attia and M. Kern, J Prosthet Dent, 91, 247-52 (2004). 9) M. A. Latta and W. W. Barkmeier, Compend Contin Educ Dent, 21, 635-9, 642-4; quiz 646 (2000). 10) K. Kamada, K. Yoshida and M. Atsuta, J Prosthet Dent, 79, 508-13 (1998). 11) M. Rosentritt, M. Behr, R. Lang and G. Handel, Dent Mater, 16, 159-65 (2000). 12) M. B. Blatz, A. Sadan and M. Kern, J Prosthet Dent, 89, 268-74 (2003). |
A strong, durable resin bond provides high retention,23 improves marginal adaptation and prevents microleakage,24 and increases fracture resistance of the restored tooth and the restoration.25,26
[...] Bonding to traditional silica-based ceramics is a predictable procedure yielding durable results when certain guidelines are followed.24-26,29-94 However, the composition and physical properties of high-strength ceramic materials, such as aluminum oxide-based (Al2O3)95-99 and zirconium oxide-based (ZrO2) ceramics,100 differ substantially from silica-based ceramics96,101,102 and require alternative bonding techniques to achieve a strong, long-term, durable resin bond. 23. el-Mowafy O. The use of resin cements in restorative dentistry to overcome retention problems. J Can Dent Assoc 2001;67:97-102. 24. Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Avera SP. Porcelain-composite interface microleakage with various porcelain surface treatments. Dent Mat 1991;7: 118-23. 25. Reference deleted. 26. Jensen ME, Sheth JJ, Tolliver D. Etched-porcelain resin-bonded full-veneer crowns: in vitro fracture resistance. Compendium 1989;10:336-8, 340-1, 344-7. 29. Latta MA, Barkmeier WW. Approaches for intraoral repair of ceramic restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000;21:635-9, 642-4. 94. Della Bona A, van Noort R. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 1995;74:1591-6. 95. McLean JW, Hughes TH. The reinforcement of dental porcelain with ceramic oxides. Br Dent J 1965;119:251-67. 96. Seghi RR, Sorensen JA. Relative flexural strength of six new ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:239-46. 97. Andersson M, Oden A. A new all-ceramic crown: a dense-sintered, high-purity alumina coping with porcelain. Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51:59-64. 98. Zeng K, Oden A, Rowcliffe D. Flexure tests on dental ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:434-9. 99. Zeng K, Oden A, Rowcliffe D. Evaluation of mechanical properties of dental ceramic core materials in combination with porcelains. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:183-9. 100. Ashizuka M, Kiyohara H, Okuno T, Kubota Y. Fatigue behavior of tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (Y-TZP) containing 2 and 4 mol% Y2O3 (Part 2). J Ceram Soc Jpn Inter Ed 1988;96:731-6. 101. Taira M, Nomura Y, Wakasa K, Yamaki M, Matsui A. Studies on fracture toughness of dental ceramics. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:551-63. 102. Giordano RA 2nd, Pelletier L, Campbell S, Pober R. Flexural strength of an infused ceramic, glass ceramic, and feldspathic porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:411-8. |
Although the source is given (in passing) nothing has been marked as a citation. |
|