Fandom

VroniPlag Wiki

Gd/047

< Gd

31.268Seiten in
diesem Wiki
Seite hinzufügen
Diskussion0 Share

Störung durch Adblocker erkannt!


Wikia ist eine gebührenfreie Seite, die sich durch Werbung finanziert. Benutzer, die Adblocker einsetzen, haben eine modifizierte Ansicht der Seite.

Wikia ist nicht verfügbar, wenn du weitere Modifikationen in dem Adblocker-Programm gemacht hast. Wenn du sie entfernst, dann wird die Seite ohne Probleme geladen.

Analysis of the European Union’s performance as an international mediator in the South Caucasus with respect to peace building in the region

von Dr. George Danielidze

vorherige Seite | zur Übersichtsseite | folgende Seite
Statistik und Sichtungsnachweis dieser Seite findet sich am Artikelende
[1.] Gd/Fragment 047 03 - Diskussion
Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2013-12-16 21:49:11 Guckar
Baracani 2004, Fragment, Gd, Gesichtet, SMWFragment, Schutzlevel sysop, Verschleierung

Typus
Verschleierung
Bearbeiter
Graf Isolan
Gesichtet
Yes.png
Untersuchte Arbeit:
Seite: 47, Zeilen: 3-23
Quelle: Baracani 2004
Seite(n): 55, 56, Zeilen: 55:42ff. - 56:1-8
It seems that the neighbourhood policy adopted the same instruments and techniques based on the evolved pre-accession process for the Central and Eastern European states, which are judged to have worked in promoting political reform in candidate countries. Respectively, in the first phase of the ENP political priorities are contained in the Action Plans, while for candidate countries they are contained in the Accession Partnerships. In the second phase, the Commission will report on progress accomplished by the neighbour, as far as every year the Commission reports on progress accomplished by the candidates; and then, on the basis of this evaluation, the EU will review the content of the Action Plan and decide on its adaptation and renewal as it is for the candidate countries – the Union updates the priorities contained in the Accession Partnerships almost every year. All these similarities confirm the statement of the Commission that in enriching relations with partner countries, it will draw on the experience gained in supporting the process of political transition in the new member states and in candidate countries.

The main difference between the EU relations with candidate countries and those coming within the framework of the ENP (non-candidates) has to do with incentives, as only the first foresees the prospect of full EU membership, which is widely recognized to have had a powerful positive effect on the processes of democratic transformation and consolidation among the Central and East European countries. The other foresees the eleven incentives71 in the short term, which aim at reinforcing political, economic and cultural cooperation and some political and economic integration in the long term, which is very different from membership.


71 See Appendix 4 p. 182

[Seite 55]

As concerns structures, it seems that the neighbourhood policy will adopt the same instruments and techniques based on the evolved pre-accession process for the central and eastern European states, which are judged to have worked in promoting political reform in candidate countries. In the framework of the ENP, in a first phase, political priorities will be contained in Action Plans, while for candidate countries they are contained in Accession Partnerships, both Action Plans and Accession Partnerships respecting the principles of joint ownership and differentiation. In a second phase the Commission will report on progress accomplished by the neighbour, as far as every year the Commission reports on progress accomplished by candidates; and then, on the basis of this evaluation, the EU will review the content of the Action Plan and decide on its adaptation and renewal; for candidates countries the Union updates the priorities contained in the Accession Partnerships almost every year. All these similarities confirm the

[Seite 56]

statement of the Commission, that in enriching relations with partner countries, it will draw on the experience gained in supporting the process of political transition in the new member states and in candidate countries.

The main difference between the strategy of democracy promotion in the framework of enlargement and the strategy of democratization in the framework of the ENP has to do with incentives, as only the first foresees the prospect of full EU membership, which is widely recognized to have had a powerful positive effect on the processes and outcomes of democratic transformation and consolidation among the CEEs. Indeed, the other foresees, as we have seen, eleven incentives, in the short term, which aim at reinforcing political, security, economic and cultural cooperation and some political and economic integration in the long term, which is very different from membership.

Anmerkungen

Ohne Hinweis auf eine Übernahme.

Sichter
(Graf Isolan) Schumann


vorherige Seite | zur Übersichtsseite | folgende Seite
Letzte Bearbeitung dieser Seite: durch Benutzer:Guckar, Zeitstempel: 20131216214927

Auch bei Fandom

Zufälliges Wiki