- Problematic text parallels can be found in the following chapters (state of analysis: XXX):
- 1. INTRODUCTION, OBJECTIVES AND LITERATURE REVIEW
- 1.3.2 Differences between wild barley and cultivated barley (p. 4-5): pages 4, 5
- 1.3.3 Wild barley (H. vulgar ssp. spontaneum) (p. 5-6): pages 5, 6 – [completely]
- 1.3.6 Barley breeding for tolerance /resistance to Fusarium head blight (p. 9-10): page 9
- 1.3.10 Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) Technology
- 3. RESULTS [beg.] (p. 35): page 35 – [completely]
- 4. DISCUSSION [beg.] (p. 73): page 73
- Currently there are 7 reviewed fragments documented that are considered to be violations of citation rules. For 7 of them there is no reference given to the source used („Verschleierungen“ and „Komplettplagiate“). For 0 fragments the source is given, but the extent of the used text is not made clear („Bauernopfer“).
- The publication has 83 pages that have been analyzed. On a total of 7 of these pages violations of citation rules have been documented. This represents a percentage of 8.4%. The 83 analyzed pages break down with respect to the amount of text parallels encountered as follows:
- From these statistics an extrapolation of the amount of text of the publication under investigation that has been documented as problematic can be estimated (conservatively) as about 2% of the main part of the publication.
- In all, text was taken from 2 sources.
The following chart illustrates the amount and the distribution of the text parallel findings. The colours show the type of plagiarism diagnosed:
- grau="Komplettplagiat" (copy & paste): the source of the text parallel is not given, the copy is verbatim.
- rot="Verschleierung" (disguised plagiarism): the source of the text parallel is not given, the copied text will be somewhat modified.
(state of analysis: XXX)