Fandom

VroniPlag Wiki

Jm/161

< Jm

31.377Seiten in
diesem Wiki
Seite hinzufügen
Diskussion0 Teilen

Störung durch Adblocker erkannt!


Wikia ist eine gebührenfreie Seite, die sich durch Werbung finanziert. Benutzer, die Adblocker einsetzen, haben eine modifizierte Ansicht der Seite.

Wikia ist nicht verfügbar, wenn du weitere Modifikationen in dem Adblocker-Programm gemacht hast. Wenn du sie entfernst, dann wird die Seite ohne Probleme geladen.

Reconsolidation: Behavioural and Electrophysiological Sequelae of Context and Stress in Human Episodic Memory

von Dr. Jennifer L. Moore

vorherige Seite | zur Übersichtsseite | folgende Seite
Statistik und Sichtungsnachweis dieser Seite findet sich am Artikelende
[1.] Jm/Fragment 161 18 - Diskussion
Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2014-03-25 22:19:22 Hindemith
Curran and Cleary 2002, Fragment, Gesichtet, Jm, SMWFragment, Schutzlevel sysop, Verschleierung

Typus
Verschleierung
Bearbeiter
Hindemith
Gesichtet
Yes.png
Untersuchte Arbeit:
Seite: 161, Zeilen: 18-25
Quelle: Curran and Cleary 2002
Seite(n): 192, Zeilen: l.col: 6-13
Second, the parietal old/new effect is sensitive to variables thought to affect recollection more than familiarity such as depth of processing (Rugg, Allan & Birch, 2000; Rugg et al., 1998; Paller, Kutas & McIsaac, 1995; Pallar & Kutas, 1992). Third, when participants are asked to introspectively differentiate words specifically ‘remembered’ from those merely ‘known’ to be old, larger parietal old/new effects are associated with ‘remembering’ than ‘knowing’ (Düzel et al., 1997; Rugg, Schoerscheidt & Mark, 1998; Smith, 1993; but also see Spencer, Vila Abad & Donchin, 2000).

Düzel, E., Yonelinas, A.P., Mangun, G.R., Heinze, H.J., & Tulving, E. (1997). Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94, 5973-5978.

Paller, K. A. & Kutas, M. (1992). Brain potentials during memory retrieval provide neurophysiological support for the distinction between conscious recollection and priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 375-391.

Paller, K. A., Kutas, M., & McIsaac, H. (1995). Monitoring conscious recollection via the electrical activity of the brain. Psychological Science, 6, 107-111.

Rugg, M.D., Allan, K., & Birch, C.S. (2000). Electrophysiological evidence for the modulation of retrieval orientation by depth of study processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 664- 678.

Rugg, M.D., Mark, R.E., Walla, P., Schloerscheidt, A.M., Birch, C.S., & Allan, K. (1998). Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature, 392, 595– 598.

Rugg, M.D., Schloerscheidt, A.M., & Mark, R.E. (1998). An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection. Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 47-69.

Smith, M.E. (1993). Neurophysiological manifestations of recollective experience during recognition memory judgments. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 113.

Spencer, K. M., Vila Abad, E., & Donchin, E. (2000). On the search for the neurophysiological manifestation of recollective experience. Psychophysiology, 37, 494-506.

Second, the parietal old/new effect is sensitive to variables thought to affect recollection more than familiarity such as depth of processing [40,41,57,61]. Third, when subjects are asked to introspectively differentiate words specifically ‘remembered’ from those merely ‘known’ to be old, larger parietal old/new effects are associated with ‘remembering’ than ‘knowing’ [14,59,63] (but also see Ref. [65]).

[14] E. Duzel, A.P Yonelinas, G.R. Mangun, H.-J. Heinze, E. Tulving, Event-related potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 (1997) 5973-5978.

[40] K.A. Paller, M. Kutas, Brain potentials during memory retrieval provide neurophysiological support of the distinction between conscious recollection and priming, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 4 (1992) 375-391.

[41] K.A. Paller, M. Kutas, H.K. McIsaac, Monitoring conscious recollection via the electrical activity of the brain, Psychol. Sci. 6 (1995) 107-111.

[57] M.D. Rugg, K. Allan, C.S. Birch, Electrophysiological evidence for the modulation of retrieval orientation by depth of study processing, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12 (2000) 664-678.

[59] M.D. Rugg, A.M. Schloerscheidt, R.E. Mark, An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection, J. Mem. Lang. 39 (1998) 47-69.

[61] M.D. Rugg, P Walla, A.M. Schloerscheidt, P.C. Fletcher, C.D. Frith, R.J. Dolan, Neural correlates of depth of processing effects on recollection: evidence from brain potentials and positron emission tomography, Exp. Brain Res. 123 (1998) 18-23.

[63] M.E. Smith, Neurophysiological manifestations of recollective experience during recognition memory judgments, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5 (1993) 1-13.

[65] K.M. Spencer, E. Vila Abad, E. Donchin, On the search for the neurophysiological manifestation of recollective experience, Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 494-506.

Anmerkungen

The source is not given. Apart from the text also most references to the literature are identical.

Sichter
(Hindemith) Schumann


vorherige Seite | zur Übersichtsseite | folgende Seite
Letzte Bearbeitung dieser Seite: durch Benutzer:Hindemith, Zeitstempel: 20140325222106

Auch bei Fandom

Zufälliges Wiki