|
|
|
| Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 435, Zeilen: 34-40 |
Quelle: Stephenson and Zelen 1989 Seite(n): 2, 3, Zeilen: 2: 31ff; 3: 1ff |
|---|---|
| A review of key centrality concepts can be found in the papers by Freeman et al. [23]. Their work has significantly contributed to the conceptual clarification and theoretical application of centrality. He provides three general measures of centrality termed “degree”, “closeness”, and “betweenness”. His development was partially motivated by the structural properties of the center of a star graph. The most basic idea of degree centrality in a graph is the adjacency count of its constituent nodes.
23. Freeman, L.C., Freeman, S.C., Michaelson, A.G.: On Human Social Intelligence. Journal of Social and Biological Structures 11, 415–425 (1988) |
A review of key centrality concepts can be found in the papers by Freeman (1979a,b). His work has significantly contributed to the conceptual clarification and theoretical application of centrality. Motivated by the work of Nieminen (1974), Sabidussi (1966), and Bavelas (1948) he provides three general measures of centrality termed
[page 3] “degree”, “closeness”, and “betweenness”. His development is partially motivated by the structural properties of the center of a star graph. The most basic idea of point centrality in a graph is the adjacency count of its constituent points. “ Freeman, L.C. 1979 a “Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks I: 215-239. |
The reference to Freeman et al. is to a different paper, a group work that does not deal with centrality concepts. Interestingly, referring to the authors the next sentence speaks of "Their", the one after that of "He", and then "His", which parallels the sentences in Stephenson & Zelen. The word "point" has been replaced by "node". Stephenson & Zelen 1989 are not mentioned anywhere in the paper. |
|