Fandom

VroniPlag Wiki

Quelle:Jm/Curran and Cleary 2002

< Quelle:Jm

31.373Seiten in
diesem Wiki
Seite hinzufügen
Diskussion0

Störung durch Adblocker erkannt!


Wikia ist eine gebührenfreie Seite, die sich durch Werbung finanziert. Benutzer, die Adblocker einsetzen, haben eine modifizierte Ansicht der Seite.

Wikia ist nicht verfügbar, wenn du weitere Modifikationen in dem Adblocker-Programm gemacht hast. Wenn du sie entfernst, dann wird die Seite ohne Probleme geladen.

Angaben zur Quelle [Bearbeiten]

Autor     Tim Curran, Anne M. Cleary
Titel    Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition
Zeitschrift    Cognitive Brain Res
Verlag    Elsevier
Ausgabe    15
Jahr    2003
Seiten    191-205
URN    http://psych.colorado.edu/~tcurran/Curran&Cleary_2003.pdf

Literaturverz.   

no
Fußnoten    no
Fragmente    1


Fragmente der Quelle:
[1.] Jm/Fragment 161 18 - Diskussion
Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2014-03-25 22:19:22 Hindemith
Curran and Cleary 2002, Fragment, Gesichtet, Jm, SMWFragment, Schutzlevel sysop, Verschleierung

Typus
Verschleierung
Bearbeiter
Hindemith
Gesichtet
Yes.png
Untersuchte Arbeit:
Seite: 161, Zeilen: 18-25
Quelle: Curran and Cleary 2002
Seite(n): 192, Zeilen: l.col: 6-13
Second, the parietal old/new effect is sensitive to variables thought to affect recollection more than familiarity such as depth of processing (Rugg, Allan & Birch, 2000; Rugg et al., 1998; Paller, Kutas & McIsaac, 1995; Pallar & Kutas, 1992). Third, when participants are asked to introspectively differentiate words specifically ‘remembered’ from those merely ‘known’ to be old, larger parietal old/new effects are associated with ‘remembering’ than ‘knowing’ (Düzel et al., 1997; Rugg, Schoerscheidt & Mark, 1998; Smith, 1993; but also see Spencer, Vila Abad & Donchin, 2000).

Düzel, E., Yonelinas, A.P., Mangun, G.R., Heinze, H.J., & Tulving, E. (1997). Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94, 5973-5978.

Paller, K. A. & Kutas, M. (1992). Brain potentials during memory retrieval provide neurophysiological support for the distinction between conscious recollection and priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 375-391.

Paller, K. A., Kutas, M., & McIsaac, H. (1995). Monitoring conscious recollection via the electrical activity of the brain. Psychological Science, 6, 107-111.

Rugg, M.D., Allan, K., & Birch, C.S. (2000). Electrophysiological evidence for the modulation of retrieval orientation by depth of study processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 664- 678.

Rugg, M.D., Mark, R.E., Walla, P., Schloerscheidt, A.M., Birch, C.S., & Allan, K. (1998). Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature, 392, 595– 598.

Rugg, M.D., Schloerscheidt, A.M., & Mark, R.E. (1998). An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection. Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 47-69.

Smith, M.E. (1993). Neurophysiological manifestations of recollective experience during recognition memory judgments. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 113.

Spencer, K. M., Vila Abad, E., & Donchin, E. (2000). On the search for the neurophysiological manifestation of recollective experience. Psychophysiology, 37, 494-506.

Second, the parietal old/new effect is sensitive to variables thought to affect recollection more than familiarity such as depth of processing [40,41,57,61]. Third, when subjects are asked to introspectively differentiate words specifically ‘remembered’ from those merely ‘known’ to be old, larger parietal old/new effects are associated with ‘remembering’ than ‘knowing’ [14,59,63] (but also see Ref. [65]).

[14] E. Duzel, A.P Yonelinas, G.R. Mangun, H.-J. Heinze, E. Tulving, Event-related potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 (1997) 5973-5978.

[40] K.A. Paller, M. Kutas, Brain potentials during memory retrieval provide neurophysiological support of the distinction between conscious recollection and priming, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 4 (1992) 375-391.

[41] K.A. Paller, M. Kutas, H.K. McIsaac, Monitoring conscious recollection via the electrical activity of the brain, Psychol. Sci. 6 (1995) 107-111.

[57] M.D. Rugg, K. Allan, C.S. Birch, Electrophysiological evidence for the modulation of retrieval orientation by depth of study processing, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12 (2000) 664-678.

[59] M.D. Rugg, A.M. Schloerscheidt, R.E. Mark, An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection, J. Mem. Lang. 39 (1998) 47-69.

[61] M.D. Rugg, P Walla, A.M. Schloerscheidt, P.C. Fletcher, C.D. Frith, R.J. Dolan, Neural correlates of depth of processing effects on recollection: evidence from brain potentials and positron emission tomography, Exp. Brain Res. 123 (1998) 18-23.

[63] M.E. Smith, Neurophysiological manifestations of recollective experience during recognition memory judgments, J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5 (1993) 1-13.

[65] K.M. Spencer, E. Vila Abad, E. Donchin, On the search for the neurophysiological manifestation of recollective experience, Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 494-506.

Anmerkungen

The source is not given. Apart from the text also most references to the literature are identical.

Sichter
(Hindemith) Schumann

Auch bei Fandom

Zufälliges Wiki