# Quelle:Jm/Goh et al 2004

## < Quelle:Jm

32.614Seiten in
diesem Wiki

Angaben zur Quelle [Bearbeiten]

 Autor Joshua O. S. Goh, Soon Chun Siong, Denise Park, Angela Gutchess, Andy Hebrank, Michael W. L. Chee Titel Cortical Areas Involved in Object, Background, and Object– Background Processing Revealed with Functional Magnetic Resonance Adaptation Zeitschrift The Journal of Neuroscience Herausgeber Society for Neuroscience Datum 10. November 2004 Jahrgang 24 Nummer 45 Seiten 10223-10228 DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3373-04.2004 URL http://www.jneurosci.org/content/24/45/10223.full.pdf Literaturverz. yes Fußnoten yes Fragmente 4

Fragmente der Quelle:
 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2014-01-12 21:34:40 Graf Isolan

 Typus KomplettPlagiat Bearbeiter Hindemith Gesichtet
Untersuchte Arbeit:
Seite: 108, Zeilen: 24-25
Quelle: Goh et al 2004
Seite(n): 10223, Zeilen: l.col: 2ff
The association between viewed items and the context in which they appear has been termed contextual binding (Chalfonte & Johnson, 1996; Mitchell et al., 2000). The capacity [to encode such associations can be distinguished from the ability to separately encode either the item or its context.] The association between viewed items and the context in which they appear has been termed “contextual binding” (Chalfonte and Johnson, 1996; Mitchell et al., 2000). The capacity to encode such associations can be distinguished from the ability to separately encode either the item or its context.
 Anmerkungen The source is not given. Sichter (Hindemith) Agrippina1

 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2014-01-12 21:28:22 Graf Isolan

 Typus KomplettPlagiat Bearbeiter Hindemith Gesichtet
Untersuchte Arbeit:
Seite: 109, Zeilen: 21-25
Quelle: Goh et al 2004
Seite(n): 10223, Zeilen: l.col: 7ff
Further, the hippocampal and PHC regions have been shown to be responsible for the association of objects with their spatial location in the stimulus environment (Burgess et al., 2002). Other neuroimaging evidence indicates that these regions are also involved in relational processing (Cohen et al., 1999), that is, in integrating or binding disparate elements in a complex scene to form a meaningful representation. The hippocampal and parahippocampal regions have been shown to be responsible for the association of objects with their spatial location in the stimulus environment (Burgess et al., 2002). Other neuroimaging evidence indicates that these regions are also involved in relational processing (Cohen et al., 1999), that is, in integrating or binding disparate elements in a complex scene to form a meaningful representation.
 Anmerkungen The source is mentioned on the following page without any indication that the here documented section is taken from it. Note that the same text has also been used on page 341 of the thesis: Jm/Fragment 341 14 Sichter (Hindemith)

 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2014-01-12 21:28:28 Graf Isolan

 Typus BauernOpfer Bearbeiter Agrippina1 Gesichtet
Untersuchte Arbeit:
Seite: 110, Zeilen: 1-6
Quelle: Goh et al 2004
Seite(n): 10223, Zeilen: I.col: 13ff
[For] example, greater activation of the HF and PHC region occurs when stimulus elements are encoded relationally or bound together rather than encoded individually (Henke et al., 1997, 1999). Thus far, in vivo demonstrations of HF and PHC activations during binding operations have used paradigms that required effortful encoding (Henke et al., 1997, 1999; Montaldi et al., 1998). However, behavioral data suggest that these processes operate without explicit intention (Luck & Vogel, 1997; Cohen et al., 1999). In line with Goh and associates (2004)who demonstrated the engagement of MTL areas in contextual binding without explicit task instructions to relate picture elements, we sought to identify behavioural correlates of contextual binding without explicit instruction to do so, in an episodic hippocampallymediated visual paired-associates task For example, greater activation of the hippocampus and parahippocampal region occurs when stimulus elements are encoded relationally or “bound” together rather than encoded individually (Henke et al., 1997, 1999). Thus far, in vivo demonstration of hippocampal and parahippocampal activations during binding operations have used paradigms that required effortful encoding (Henke et al., 1997, 1999; Montaldi et al., 1998). However, behavioral data suggest that these processes operate without explicit intention (Luck and Vogel, 1997; Cohen et al., 1999). In the present study, we sought to identify regions engaged in contextual binding without explicit instruction to do so.
 Anmerkungen The source is mentioned in the last sentence without indication that the here documented section is taken from it. Note that part of the text has also been used on page 341 of the thesis: Jm/Fragment 341 14 Sichter Hindemith

 Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2014-01-12 21:32:57 Graf Isolan

 Typus Verschleierung Bearbeiter Hindemith Gesichtet
Untersuchte Arbeit:
Seite: 341, Zeilen: 14-23
Quelle: Goh et al 2004
Seite(n): 10223, Zeilen: l.col: 7ff
Furthermore, it is widely acknowledged that the hippocampal and PHC regions are responsible for the association of objects with their spatial location in the stimulus environment. Other neuroimaging evidence indicates that these regions are also involved in relational processing, that is, in integrating or binding disparate elements in a complex scene to form a meaningful representation. For example, greater activation of the HF and PHC region occurs when stimulus elements are encoded relationally or bound together rather than encoded individually (Henke et al., 1997, 1999). Thus far, in vivo demonstrations of HF and PHC activations during binding operations have used paradigms that required effortful encoding (Henke et al., 1997, 1999; Montaldi et al., 1998). However, behavioral data suggest that these processes operate without explicit intention. The hippocampal and parahippocampal regions have been shown to be responsible for the association of objects with their spatial location in the stimulus environment (Burgess et al., 2002). Other neuroimaging evidence indicates that these regions are also involved in relational processing (Cohen et al., 1999), that is, in integrating or binding disparate elements in a complex scene to form a meaningful representation. For example, greater activation of the hippocampus and parahippocampal region occurs when stimulus elements are encoded relationally or “bound” together rather than encoded individually (Henke et al., 1997, 1999). Thus far, in vivo demonstration of hippocampal and parahippocampal activations during binding operations have used paradigms that required effortful encoding (Henke et al., 1997, 1999; Montaldi et al., 1998). However, behavioral data suggest that these processes operate without explicit intention (Luck and Vogel, 1997; Cohen et al., 1999).
 Anmerkungen There is no reference to the source. Note that the same text has been used also on pages 109, 110 of the thesis: Jm/Fragment 109 21, Jm/Fragment 110 01 Sichter (Hindemith) Agrippina1