von Dr. Rodrigo Herrera
Statistik und Sichtungsnachweis dieser Seite findet sich am Artikelende
[1.] Rh/Fragment 092 05 - Diskussion Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2012-07-31 20:59:46 WiseWoman | Daley VereJones 2003, Fragment, Gesichtet, Rh, SMWFragment, Schutzlevel sysop, Verschleierung |
|
|
Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 92, Zeilen: 5-25 |
Quelle: Daley VereJones 2003 Seite(n): 195;202, Zeilen: 1-13,24-25,35-38;13-17 |
---|---|
There exists a rich class of MPPs with a great variety of forms that can be taken by the marks and the variety of dependence relations among marks and locations. Two important classes are defined below
[...] The next definition characterizes two important types of independence relating to the mark structure of MPPs. [...] Of course the most common case of an MPP with independent marks occurs when the marks are iid. Similarly, the most common case of a process with unpredictable marks occurs when the marks are conditionally iid given the past of the process. The most interesting extensions appear when we drop the assumption of completely independent marks and consider ways in which either the marks can influence the future development of the process or the current state of the process can influence the distribution of marks, or both. |
The class of MPPs is a great deal richer than might at first appear. This is due to the great variety of forms that can be taken by the marks and the variety of
dependence relations that can exist between the marks themselves and their locations. [...] we define for MPPs the following two classes of point processes. [...] The next pair of definitions characterize two important types of independence relating to the mark structure of MPPs. [...] The most common case of an MPP with independent marks occurs when the kappa_i are in fact i.i.d. Similarly, the most common case of a process with unpredictable marks occurs when the marks are conditionally i.i.d. given the past of the process [...] The most interesting extensions appear when we drop the assumption of completely independent marks and consider ways in which either the marks can influence the future development of the process or the current state of the process can influence the distribution of marks, or both. |
Die beiden Auslassungen in der Arbeit sind mathematische Definitionen, die eo ipso als mögliches Plagiat ausscheiden. Auf S. 91 findet sich folgender Hinweis auf die Quelle: "The results shown in the next section are based on first volume of Daley and Vere-Jones (2003)." Siehe Diskussion. |
|
Letzte Bearbeitung dieser Seite: durch Benutzer:WiseWoman, Zeitstempel: 20120731210019