Fandom

VroniPlag Wiki

Tmm/Befunde

< Tmm

31.373Seiten in
diesem Wiki
Seite hinzufügen
Diskussion3 Teilen

Störung durch Adblocker erkannt!


Wikia ist eine gebührenfreie Seite, die sich durch Werbung finanziert. Benutzer, die Adblocker einsetzen, haben eine modifizierte Ansicht der Seite.

Wikia ist nicht verfügbar, wenn du weitere Modifikationen in dem Adblocker-Programm gemacht hast. Wenn du sie entfernst, dann wird die Seite ohne Probleme geladen.

FindingsBearbeiten

  • Problematic text parallels can be found in the following chapters (state of analysis: 28.04.2014):
  • Introduction [beginning] (p. 2-4): pages 2, 3, 4 – [almost completely]
  • SD and neurological disorders (p. 4-10): pages 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 – [completely]
  • Propagation of SD (p. 10-13): pages 10, 11, 12, 13 – [completely]
  • Material and methods (p. 14): page 14 – [completely (verbatim!)]
  • Electrophysiological recordings (p. 14): page 14 – [completely]
  • Induction of neocortical SD (p. 14-15): pages 14, 15 – [completely]
  • Long-term potentiation (p. 15): page 15 – [completely]
  • Experimental procedure (p. 15-16): pages 15, 16
  • Statistical analysis (p. 16): page 16 – [completely (verbatim!)]
  • Discussion (p. 38-41): pages 38, 39, 40, 41.

Prominent sourcesBearbeiten

  • El Harrak (2009): This dissertation is the source of quite substantial text parallels and is not mentioned anywhere in the thesis. It is worth noting that El Harrak (2009) in its turn contains text copied from Herreras et al. (1994) without attribution that can also be found in the thesis studied here. This original source most likely is the reason, why some references to the literature appear to be very old, see Fragment 011 04.
  • Granz (2009): The first 9 pages of the introduction are taken from this source almost in their entirety. Altogether approximately a quarter of the thesis is copied from this source without any attribution. See for instance Fragment 010 01.
  • Wernsmann et al. (2006): Substantial parts of the discussion section is taken from this source. There are several references to the source, but they are placed in the same way as many other references that have been taken from Wernsmann et al. (2006), such that the reader would never guess that most of the chapter is taken from there. See for instance Fragment 041 01.

Other observationsBearbeiten

StatisticsBearbeiten

  • Currently there are 24 reviewed fragments documented that are considered to be violations of citation rules. For 20 of them there is no reference given to the source used („Verschleierungen“ and „Komplettplagiate“). For 4 fragments the source is given, but the extent of the used text is not made clear („Bauernopfer“).
  • The publication has 40 pages that have been analyzed. On a total of 19 of these pages violations of citation rules have been documented. This represents a percentage of 47.5%. The 40 analyzed pages break down with respect to the amount of text parallels encountered as follows:
Percentage text parallels Number of pages
No text parallels documented 21
0%-50% text parallels 1
50%-75% text parallels 1
75%-100% text parallels 17
From these statistics an extrapolation of the amount of text of the publication under investigation that has been documented as problematic can be estimated (conservatively) as about 36% of the main part of the publication.


IllustrationBearbeiten

The following chart illustrates the extent and the distribution of the text parallels found. The colours show the type of violation of citation rules diagnosed:

  • grau="Komplettplagiat" (copy & paste): the source of the text parallel is not given, the copy is verbatim.
  • rot="Verschleierung" (disguised copy): the source of the text parallel is not given, the copied text will be somewhat modified.
  • gelb="Bauernopfer" (pawn sacrifice): the source of the text parallel is mentioned, but the extent and/or the closeness of the copy to the source is not made clear by the reference.

Tmm col2.png

(state of analysis: 28.04.2014)

Auch bei Fandom

Zufälliges Wiki