VroniPlag Wiki

This Wiki is best viewed in Firefox with Adblock plus extension.

MEHR ERFAHREN

VroniPlag Wiki
Research on Parliamentary Privilege Concurrently Discuss Chinese National People's Congressional Privilege

von Weizhong Yi

vorherige Seite | zur Übersichtsseite | folgende Seite

Statistik und Sichtungsnachweis dieser Seite findet sich am Artikelende

[1.] Wy/Fragment 047 01 - Diskussion
Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2013-09-12 18:34:05 Graf Isolan
BauernOpfer, Fragment, Gesichtet, SMWFragment, Schutzlevel sysop, Van der Hulst 2000, Wy

Typus
BauernOpfer
Bearbeiter
Hindemith
Gesichtet
Yes
Untersuchte Arbeit:
Seite: 47, Zeilen: 1-15
Quelle: Van der Hulst 2000
Seite(n): 67, 68, Zeilen: 67: letzte Zeilen; 68: 1ff
[It should be noted, however, that, pursuant to the Act of 29 July 1881 concerning freedom of the press, French case] law recognises that protection also extends to witnesses appearing before parliamentary committees of inquiry.147

5.2.2 Time

In some countries, “Members of parliament enjoy protection from the time of their election, on condition that the election is not subsequently declared invalid.” 148 This is the case in many countries with a French parliamentary tradition (Belgium, Italy) 149 and in many of the new democracies of Eastern Europe (Czech Republic, Estonia, Poland, Slovenia). 150 In other countries (including Mali, Russian Federation),151 protection is granted after the member’s election has been validated. In some cases, the oath-taking ceremony is the point of departure for protection. Freedom of speech applies only during sittings in a number of countries with a British parliamentary tradition (Australia, United Kingdom) and in Egypt, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Malaysia and the Philippines.152 Needless to say, Members in these countries enjoy non-accountability only with effect from the first sitting. In many other countries,[protection is afforded in all circumstances, regardless of whether parliament is in session.]


147 Paris Court of Appeal, 16 January 1984; “It is considered that the statements of witnesses before a committee of inquiry enjoy the immunity applicable to reports and documents published by order of the National Assembly and the Senate, except for defamatory or injurious statements that have no bearing on the parliamentary inquiry or are made with malicious intent.” Quoted Marc Van der Hulst,The Parliamentary Mandate, IPU, 2000, p.75.

148 See, Robert Myttenaere, Moscow Session (September 1998),The Immunities of Members of Parliamen,http://www.asgp. info/Resources/Data/ Documents/UJJICUIPKRGKNWTBNCAMS ZFAGOKNXL.pdf.

149 Marc Van der Hulst,The Parliamentary Mandate,Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union, 2000, p.76.

150 See, Robert Myttenaere, Moscow Session (September 1998),The Immunities of Members of Parliament,http://www.asgp. info/Resources/Data/ Documents/UJJICUIPKRGKNWTBNCAMS ZFAGOKNXL.pdf.

151 Id.

152 Id.

It should be noted, however, that, pursuant to the Act of 29 July 1881 concerning freedom

[Seite 68]

of the press, French case law recognises that protection also extends to witnesses appearing before parliamentary committees of inquiry.7y[sic]

Ratione temporis

In some countries, "members of parliament enjoy protection from the time of their election, on condition that the election is not subsequently declared invalid.".8"[sic] This is the case in many countries with a French parliamentary tradition (Belgium, Italy) and in many of the new democracies of Eastern Europe (Czech Republic, Estonia, Poland, Slovenia). In other countries (including Mali, Russian Federation), protection is granted after the member's election has been validated. In some cases, the oath-taking ceremony is the point of departure for protection [...]

Freedom of speech applies only during sittings in a number of countries with a British parliamentary tradition (Australia, United Kingdom) and in Egypt, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Malaysia and the Philippines. Needless to say, members in these countries enjoy non-accountability only with effect from the first sitting. In many other countries, protection is afforded in all circumstances, regardless of whether parliament is in session.


w[sic] Paris Court of Appeal, 16 January 1984; "It is considered that the statements of witnesses before a committee of inquiry enjoy the immunity applicable to reports and documents published by order of the National Assembly and the Senate, except for defamatory or injurious statements that have no bearing on the parliamentary inquiry or are made with malicious intent."

m[sic] Myttenaere, R„[sic] op. cit., p. 105.

Anmerkungen

Die vorhandenen Quellenverweise decken die weitläufigen, wörtlichen Übernahmen nicht ab.

Sichter
(Hindemith) Singulus



vorherige Seite | zur Übersichtsseite | folgende Seite
Letzte Bearbeitung dieser Seite: durch Benutzer:Graf Isolan, Zeitstempel: 20130912183447