Fandom

VroniPlag Wiki

Wy/Fragment 103 11

< Wy

31.381Seiten in
diesem Wiki
Seite hinzufügen
Diskussion0 Teilen

Störung durch Adblocker erkannt!


Wikia ist eine gebührenfreie Seite, die sich durch Werbung finanziert. Benutzer, die Adblocker einsetzen, haben eine modifizierte Ansicht der Seite.

Wikia ist nicht verfügbar, wenn du weitere Modifikationen in dem Adblocker-Programm gemacht hast. Wenn du sie entfernst, dann wird die Seite ohne Probleme geladen.


Typus
BauernOpfer
Bearbeiter
Graf Isolan
Gesichtet
Yes.png
Untersuchte Arbeit:
Seite: 103, Zeilen: 11-21
Quelle: Griffith 2007
Seite(n): 59-60, Zeilen: 26-35;1-2
It is, however, in other country, notably the UK, that the case law has developed. At issue are two related questions: Does the disputed evidence constitute parliamentary proceedings? If the proceedings are internal to Parliament, do they lie outside the jurisdiction of the courts?316

In the UK case of R v Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, ex parte Al Fayed317 the Court of Appeal refused an application for judicial review of the report of the Parliamentary Commissioner which had rejected Al Fayed’s claim that an MP (Neil Hamilton) had received a corrupt payment. It was confirmed that the Commissioner’s inquiry and report were ‘proceedings in Parliament’. It is therefore the House of Commons, not the courts, which are responsible for the activities of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. A contrast was drawn [in this respect between the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration (the Ombudsman).]



316 Gareth Griffith, Parliamentary Privilege: Major Developments and Current Issues, [1].

317 [1998] 1 ALL ER 93.

It is, however, in other jurisdictions, notably the UK and Queensland, that the case law has

developed. At issue are two related questions: does the disputed evidence constitute parliamentary proceedings? if the proceedings are internal to Parliament do they lie outside the jurisdiction of the courts?

In the UK case of R v Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, ex parte Al Fayed213 the Court of Appeal refused an application for judicial review of the report of the Parliamentary Commissioner which had rejected Al Fayed’s claim that an MP (Neil Hamilton) had received a corrupt payment. It was confirmed that the Commissioner’s inquiry and report were ‘proceedings in Parliament’. It is therefore the House of Commons, not the courts, that are responsible for the activities of the Parliamentary Commissioner for [S. 60] Standards. A contrast was drawn in this respect between the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration (the Ombudsman).


213 [1998] 1 ALL ER 93.

Anmerkungen

Art und Umfang der Übernahme bleiben ungekennzeichnet.

Sichter
(Graf Isolan) Singulus

Auch bei Fandom

Zufälliges Wiki